The New Backyard
Sign in

Norway Weighs Sweeping Health Overhaul

A majority on Norway’s health reform panel wants regional health authorities abolished, while proposed changes to urgent care have drawn municipal opposition.

Odd Inge Teige's avatar
Odd Inge Teige
Nov 2

Led by Gunnar Bovim, the government-appointed panel delivered its report, One Health Service, to Norwegian Health Minister Jan Christian Vestre on November 2. Its proposals address an aging population, shortages of health workers and patients caught between hospital and municipal services.

Vestre wants a reform delivered during the current parliamentary term. The recommendations now enter public consultation.

National politicians would take clearer responsibility

The majority would transfer ownership of hospital trusts from Norway’s four regional health authorities directly to the Ministry of Health and Care Services. It argues that this would make elected national leaders more clearly accountable for treatment capacity and priorities.

The hospital trusts, public organizations that operate hospitals, would retain their own boards. Their number would fall from 20 to between 10 and 15, while regional state bodies would support planning and coordination.

A minority favors keeping the regional authorities and placing hospitals directly beneath them, with local managers given broad powers.

The division concerns who should control the public hospital system, how decisions should be made and where political responsibility should sit.

More care near home

Municipalities would retain responsibility for family doctors and nursing homes, while hospitals and local authorities would jointly organize more care close to patients.

The proposed community care reform would bring staff, expertise and funding together across organizational boundaries. Services could include local inpatient beds and maternity support. For patients who need both hospital treatment and everyday assistance, the aim is more continuous care near home.

The panel also calls for mergers of small municipalities, arguing that larger professional teams are needed to sustain reliable services. Geography and travel distances would have to shape the decisions.

Municipalities challenge urgent-care takeover

A particularly contentious proposal would transfer out-of-hours urgent-care clinics, known as legevakt, from municipalities to the state-run specialist health service. This would place them under the same responsibility as ambulances, strengthening coordination across emergency services.

Gunn Marit Helgesen, chair of Norway’s municipal association, KS, argues that these clinics belong alongside family doctors and other local services.

KS says municipal control helps connect patients to appropriate care before hospital admission and strengthens preparedness for crises and war. It welcomes continued local responsibility for most primary care while urging stronger cooperation and financial support.

Staffing and funding remain decisive

Ahead of the report’s publication, Norwegian Medical Association president Anne-Karin Rime called for investment in staff and treatment capacity, warning against financing reform through hoped-for savings.

She also wants doctors and other health professionals to have greater influence over decisions affecting patients, with more authority exercised at individual hospitals.

The government has opened a three-month consultation. Vestre’s public meetings begin in Fredrikstad on November 30 and Kristiansand on December 1, giving patients, relatives, health workers and local authorities an opportunity to shape the next proposals.

Discussion about this post

User's avatar

Keep reading

The New Backyard

Independent journalism on security, civil preparedness, democracy and society across the Nordic and Baltic countries.

  • About
  • Archive
  • Recommendations
  • Sitemap
© 2026 Odd Inge Teige · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for writing, podcasting, and media founders.